From Monthly "Natural
Food News" 自然食ニュース September
2004 edition
FOODOLOGY 228
Monthy article that Ryu Ohta
has been writing for this natural health magazine for several years under
various sub-headings..
by Ryu Ohta
translated
by Grace-Eki
last
attempt: Novenber 12 、2004 11月12日
Chapter 11 being "Foodology
and Economics"
Part 6
"What is the real identity of the West, the face of a one
capable of
burning nine million witches in a time
span of five hundred years"
After Meiji but especially after the post WWII loss/defeat,
Japan has fallen under the blinding spell of adoration for the West and has
shown unswerving loyalty to all Western phenomenum with total and unquestioning
acceptence and embracement.
It is a behaviour of being
from post-ludicrous to the obscene.
It is a behaviour
peculiarily here and only here....(as far as I can notice...)
During the Medieval Catholic Europe, according to Michelet in his "La
Sorciere"-there was no such act as bathing for about a thousand years.
For most Japanese people, as the daily ritual is bathing this
must be hard to fathom or even imagine.
For this behaviour of not
bathing,, not washing -borders on the insanity.
The roots of this deviation
seems to have stemmed from the strict rules of Catholicism.
Michelet utilizes expression
that sounds bellic.
That Medieval Europe
declared war against the "cleanliness" of the flesh..
What is that....?
There was a schism between the
soul and the body.
The soul, the spirit as
belonging to God and the flesh, the body as belonging to the Devil.
These are the results of
theosophical inquires that occured during these Councils.
So the concluding results
from these debates and researches were the fact that the maintenace, the
hygiene of the body implied an activity in communion with the Satan.
If this is not insanity, I
wouldn't know what would be.
Once again according to
Michelet, but from many other testimonies as well-medieval saints were often
appraised and applauded for
not even washing their hands!
Is this Catholic
self-illusion or self-delusion?
One can not and should not
dismiss this factor as some bygone quaint trace of Medievalism that has nothing
to do with the current modern and "Enlightened" West.
Even now bathing is neither
a frequent or a daily issue for some Westerners.
I have also been told that
there are some women who are satified with a monthly bath.
It has been said that the
origin of perfume stems from this necessity to hide body ordours.
The origin of bathing stems
probably from the natural spas that exist in Japan.
Underneath Japan and all
around the Islands, about ten percent of the volcanic energy of the world is
concentrated here.
Therefore it may be logical
that too, by extension that volcanic energy is here producing these spas.
Eighty percent of Japan's
land mass is mountainous. Spas or
natural hot springs are scattered all throughout Japan.
These can be found
everywhere, even in Tokyo for example.
Japanese bathing style is
based on these spas/public baths that were created wherever there were hot
springs.
So it is a ridiculous step
back, when Japan bends itself backward in order to copy the West along with
some of its barbaric and absurd practices.
But it was not all barbarism
at the beginning.
Michelet also states that at
the beginning and continuing the tradition even now, in fact that the
Christians cursed nature from the inwards of their bodies down to the cellular
level, and found nature guilty, and to be punished....and that they were able
to see the precence of a physicalized Demon even in a flower.
What kind of
vision/interpretaion of the world, is that...
This absurdity-to curse
nature.
And do not for a moment
think that this is a finished and past concept of the West.
The binding rule of
Catholicism forced poeple in to accepting the no bathing law.
But this is just an entrance
into the labryinth of absurdity.
Christianity found women to
be the portal for Demon, and found females by extention- to be agents of the
Devil himself.
The consequence of this was the initial toruture and
subsequent death by burning of nine million women.
This was by no means a
closed and finished case.
A blot in absudrdity, an
anomaly in the history of the West that has all but been vanquished......
For the extention of this
mentality can still be seen in the current history of the world.
By cursing nature for over a
thousand years, the West finally has the confindence in conquering and subduing
Nature to the will of mankind.
This is a crucial point for
the shift in the mentality.
The English word
"nature" means the baisc character, the innate characterisitcs of
one/ of a being.
This was translated as
"shi zen" 自然 in Japanese.
So when the Western world
speaks about conquering nature/Nature, it implies altering the natural
character of whatever in order to fit into the agenda of mankind. This means to
change, coerce, control, and manipulate.
Human beings are also
included in this scheme as part of nature.
There is an English term,
"human nature".
The natural character of a
human being,, natural behaviour, the basic instinct of mankind, standard
pattern of behaviour for a human being, a common inclination in most of the
mankind etc..-are implied in that expression..
After the intial assault by
"Christianity", the Western world has been subjucated to these
following patterns for over two thousand years.;
-the first one being the
total and complete destruction of Nature
-the destruction and
domination of the will of the universe itself.
As mankind changes itself,
so does the rest of the world..
As he refashions himself, so
by force the whole enviroment becomes influenced and pays with consequnece.
The earth, the trees,
mountains, lakes, sea, even the air....
The English penseur Aldous
Huxley (1894-1963) in his "The Brave New World; Revisited" states....
( Unfortunately the book is
not in my hands-translator's, currently to be able to give the correct quote
but the content is expressed later on within this passage)
Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" (published in 1931)
along with H.G.Wells"1984"
(published in 1949) can be considered as a kind of blue-print guide as to the
future, that the West is attempting to proceed by dragging the rest of the
globe towards. These books are
both considered as a masterpiece and a kind of expose of the elite's intent.
The question here is what is
this thing called "civilization".
This needs to be cleared.
As I have stated befrore the
Western word civlization has little in common with the Japanese word for
civilization文明
The roots, the premises are
diametrically opposite to be considered the same word.
If one boils down Huxley's
thoughts from his books, one can find the following
that the motive of
civilization is to change the natural human order to that of the order of the
hive....
The world of the bee, is
their ideal.
These people are strange.
After declaring war against
nature and immolating nine million witches ( among other human as well as
countless animals), out from the ashes arises this new concept, that of the
world as according to the order of bees......
In Medieval Europe, due to
the combination of famine and lack of hygiene, pestilence raged constantly.
Medical care and attention
was given most exclusively to the upper class.
The commoners were left and
abandoned behind.
On Sundays, the Church door
steps would be filled with beggars and sick people hoping for care and/or
salvation.
But according to the very
words of the Church these people were regarded as sinners and hence their
suffering jusitified and not ought to be remedied or helped.
Michelet's book "La Sorciere"quoted here.
So these women who would be
labelled "witches"worked for the populace.
These are those that helped
and aided to remedy and alleviate the maladies with their hands and
knowledge,,,,,,
They knew midwifery and
natural medicine.
They had the knowledge for
survival that has been distilled down generations for the well being of all.
The presence of such beings
was unforgivable to the Church.
The Church declared war
against them under the label of witch and witchcraft.
Another label for a witch
was "femme-savants"or knowledgeable women.
These were creatures said to be in liason with the Devil and had to be burnt
alive.
After this blind insanity
that continued for several hundreds of years, this process finally created the
space/vacuum possible for the emergence of a new type of war agianst nature,
that of conquering and demanding it confirm to human agenda as there is no God,
no spirit, only matter and material in this world.
It is the scientific technology ("technoscience"-science as the
servant of technology of Paul Virilio, or "scientism"/ science gone
mad as labeled by Michael Hoffman ) that enabled the West to become masters of
this world.
The approach of this science
is to first dissect Nature into bits and pieces and to experiment its various
parts/phenomena in a closed, contained and controllable enviroment of
laboratory.
The main purpose is to
torture it.
Or at least so it appears.
Then they proceed to pick
and choose whatever data of convenience to their already thought
out/pre-conceived conclusion and to disregard the rest as invalid, hence
garbage to be thrown out.
This is what is known as a
"scientific research".
It is definitely not
objective.
The typical example of this
approach can be seen in the animal experimantation.
Correctly termed or
incorrectly termed "vivi-section" since they are usually alive only
at the beginning.
Contemporary Western history
is said to start around the end of fifteenth century with the
"discovery" of the New World by Columbus. (1492 or so?)
Or it is claimed that the
reconquest of Granada from Islam and the emergence of an unified Spain under
Isabel and Ferdinand., enabling the formation of a powerful Spain with its
imperial colonialism was the beginning of the modern world.
Also the Reformation of
Luther, followed by Calvin, the emergence of capitalism, as well as the birth
for the study of natural sciences.........all these are said to have paved the
way for modernity, thus the basis of modern Western world.
The beginning of ths
empirical approach to science may be seen with the study in human dissection.
(There is a lot of
relationship here with the concept of a clock-work mechanical universe of
Descartes as the foundation of modern scietific research)
Death at hospitals and
medical centers ennabled the possibility to study cadavers.
Also the executions provided
fresh corpses.
These classess were open to the public and some of the professors became
super-stars of that period..
This course/approach became
an intergrated part of study for any discipline related to science and the
enthusiasm of the West for dissection seems unabated even to this day.
So from dissecting dead
matter, i.e. cadavers, to dissecting live/alive matter -the step appears as if
by logical order.
And it seems to be the
process/ history of Western research.
It appears that the medical
world seems to be only too happy to practice their theory by dissecting live
humans but morals and ethics has forbade that, at least on the surface.
So the compromise was
reached by applying the issue to the animal world.
But scientific researchers
appears to be not satisfied and longs for a live subject that can be
experimented with no moral or social interference.
Thus the need for the
creation of genetically engineered animals and experiments at a more cellular
/molecular level.
{"The German
doctors tried in Nurenberg by the Allied court for experimenting on prisoners
explained that since they had practiced on animal viviseciton, it was
"logical" that they wanted to experiment on human beings as
well. They were not SS Troopers
but respected physicians, and the entire planning of the experimentation on
prisoners was in the hands of such leading authorities as Dr. Sievers, chairman
of the Reich Research Counci8l....Dr. Gebbardt, president of the German Red
Cross(!) among many others...
"Slaughter of the Innocent" by Hans Ruesch Civitas Publications pg. 349-50
HUMAN GUINEA PIGS..
Inevitably, the tortures society permits to be inflicted upon animals fall back
upon society itself, as if by workings of some mysterious moral law. So Pavlov's "conditioned
reflexes" experiments, which caused pain or acute distress to thousands of
animals, are now being completely repeated, with variations, on human
subjects. And, as usual, on such
humans as are unable to protest, strike back or sue -the orphaned or abandoned
children, the mentally handicapped, the destitute dependent on public welfare;
in sum, all those who are as helpless as laboratory animals.
Between the two World Wars, while Nobel laureate
Psavlov's experiments on animals were eargerly being followed and imitated in
laboratories the world over, a book titled Behaviorism (Norton, 1925, and The People's Institue Publishing Company,
New York, 1930) appeared in the U.S., by a Dr. John B.Watson, at one time
director of the psychological laboratory of John Hopkins University. He described dropping new-born children
just when they were falling asleep, to test "loss of support";
robbing of toys; letting them be bullied; placing acid in their mouths; and it
states the amazing (!) fact that burning or pricking or cutting produced crying
and screaming and an attempt to escape the pain by withdrawing the body, etcetera,
etcetera, etcetera.
"We were rather loath at
first to conduct experiments in this field," sanctimoniously wrote this
"researcher", who then overcame this qualms arguing "but the
need of study was so great that we finally decided to build up fears in the
infant and then later to study practical methods for removing them. We chose as our subject Albert B., an
infant weighing 21 pounds at 11 months of age...He had lived his whole life in
the hospital. He was a wonderfully
'good baby'. In all the months we
worked with him we never saw him cry until our experimnts were made!"
To make Albert cry, a white rat, which had been his
playmate for weeks, was presented to him, as just as he reached for the rat a
steel bar was struck with a carpenter's hammer right behind his head. Albert jumped violently, burying his
face in the mattress. The
experiment was repeated until the infant was a nervous wreck: He bagan to cry
as soon as the rat was shown, fell over, raised himself on all fours, and began
to crawl away so rapidly that he was caught with diffriculty before he reached
the edge of the mattress. Finally
the infant was frightened by everything he had played with. The experiment came to an end because
he was adopted.
So here are more instances where a vivisector, under
the pretext of "Studying practical methods for removing fears", just
inflicts fears, submitting the hapless infants to such traumas that their
psyches will probably be scarred forever, and that they might have grown up
into adults as twisted as their torturers. (In 1923, a Rockerfeller money was
granted to enable those new Pavlovians, the Behaviourists, to experiment on
70 children ranging in age
from three months to seven years.) pg.351-353}
The beginning of experimental science took place in
1637 with the publication of that Discourse on Method by Descartes which
taught man a new way of thinking, and led to modern technology. But who could foresee in this New World
being born in the midst of widespread enthusaism the danger of an exclusively
mecahnistic knowledge? Hardly
Descartes, who himself a negation of the arts and all human sentiments-his
private life was a failure and who believed in a mechanistic biology,
establishing the basis for what may well be mankind's greatest error.
In his thirst for knowledge through experimentation,
Descartes also practiced viviseciton, making it a symbol of
"progress" to succeeding mechanists. Descartes himslef, of course, had learned nothing form this
practice, as demonstrated by his statement that aniamls don't suffer, and that
their cries mean nothing more than the creaking of the wheel.. Then why not whip the cart insted of
the horse? Descartes never
troubled to explain that. But he
gave us "proof" of his theory the fact that the harder one beats a
dog, the louder it howls. Through
him a new science was born, deprived of wisdom and humanity, thus containing
the seed of defeat at birth. pg 12-13
Descartes, a geometer, had pushed
the cage over new ground, teaching mankind another way of thinking, which is called
after him Cartesian. Thanks to
Descartes, today's cage dwells on a territory that was unknown to Aristotle;
but it has also moved beyond the range of certain notions and values which are
at least as importent for the understanding of the world and of life as any
chemical or mathmatical formula.
While rapidly extending the borders of human
knowledge, the Cartesian technique of thinking, spurning all intuition and
philosophical thought, substitued a new, macroscopic error for all preceeding
ones, an error whcih contained from the inception the seed of future defeat,
because it led the scientists unawaredly away from the truth of life, and thus
away from the scientific ideals.
By denying the importence, and
even the very existence, of anything that can not be weighed or measured, they
divorced themselves away from reality.
So the idea of roasting in an oven live animals in
order "to discover the secret of fever" could be conceived only by a
caged mind, one rigidly limited by a mechanist conception of life and health,
like Claude Bernard's. The founder
of today's vivisectionist method thus demonstrated that he was unable to distiunguish
between cause and effect-had failed to understand that the raised temperature
of a diseased individual was the consequence, not the origin, of a malady. And in the same way modern medicine
presumes to cure disease by masking their symptoms-which very often, as in the
case of fever, are nature's way to restablish health."(pg.268-69)}"
Within the desire and the
capability to decode the DNA and other genetic codes, lies this desire to
control all life from a vivisectionist's/mechanist's point of view.
Literally engineering life
at all levels....
Hence the dream of the
scientists that started in the sixteenth century becomes reality, in the 21st
century, with the triumph of man's will and ingenuity over Nature.
"Scientific
dictatorship" is winning.
But what is this
"life" that they hold in their hands?
So that they can decode the
DNA and manipulate/create/engineer Life.
Despite that they are unable
to comrehend the life force, the will behind the process, to grow, change and
develop behind the codes and symbols.
For this will is neither matter
nor energy.
It is a state before
becoming that.
A state of空, of ether and
of even before that, that of 無.
Mae Wan Ho s work," GENETIC ENGINEERING: Dream or Nightmare?"
Second edition, revised
andupdated of 1999, by Continuum, New York
This is book is of a very
high quality and full of pertinent questions that all laymen should be aware
of.
Despite that, it has not
received the attention it deserves here in Japan.
Here are some quotations
from the book:
{"Would anyone think of investing in
genetic -engineering biotechnology if they knew how fluid and adaptable genes
and genomes are? The notion of an
isolatable, constant gene that can be patented as an invention for all the
marvellous things it can do is the greatest reductionist myth ever
perpetuated..
The fluidity of the genome is involved in actively
maintaing the stability of genes and genomes. This is what organic stability-as opposed to mechanical
stability -is all about.
Genomes are continuously changing as
a result of many processes, operating constantly on developmental and evolutionary
time-scales. These process
destabilize genes and genomes, move genes around, mutate, rearrange, recombine,
replicate sequences, delete or insert sequences, and even exchange and convert
sequences..
It is becoming clear that the "fluid genome" processes
are a complex regulatory system for carrying out the 'natural genetic
engineering' on which life depends.
Natural genetic engineering is nothing if not precise. The artificial genetic engineering done
by human beings, by contrast, ends up being random, because it is controlled
neither by the organism nor by the human being. It is also dangerous, because it attacks the very mechanism
that maintain the integrity and autonomy of living organisms, even as they are
inextricably entangled within their ecological enviroment.."}
She is absolutely correct here.
To adapt to the enviroment,
there is here, the will of nature, of life.
And that "will"
can never be detected among matter.
To search for it there is an
excercise in futility.
For it is born from無
Perhaps one can say it is
born out from the matrix of all polarity.
It is incredible to me, that
a human being with a mentality like Hans Ruesch still exists in the West.
Here are few more of his
thinking from the same book abovementioned.
"Convinced that in the whole universe
nothing is as importent as his
life, his well being,, his pleasure, man , self-styled Crown of
Creation, takes it for granted that he may inflict any suffering he chooses
upon the dumb animals; and a Church that barely a century ago considered it
normal to celebrate All Saints Day in Italy by burning barrels full of live
cats in the town squares (young vandals still do it in Rome and other Italian
cities today, and not only on special holidays), has contributed notably to such
an attitude. Strange charity ,
which excludes the most defenseless creatures, and sactions the atrocities
committed against them on the contention that the torturer is made in the image
of God. Some Image!"
(pg.320-21)
He is absolutely correct.
I feel there was an
abundance of this kind of human beings before the five hundred years of witch
burning that occured from approximately 13th to the 18th century, not to
mention other kinds of suppression, torture and massacres......
This concept that nature could
be evil....
This is a concept of
absurdity, or worse of insanity and in essence, is a diabolical twist towards
life.
And that human nature also
could be so (evil) as well.
So that out of this ash of
negativity and destruction, came the birth of science which chose Nature as its
enemy and can not accept the existnece of nautral/wild creatures for who/what
they are and consequently,
by extension of that
natural/inate tendencies built within mankind.
No wonder that this is the
science of death, imbalance and destruction.
One can comprehend and begin
to see why such a science would eventually lead to the destruction of
"human nature".
Hence the omnious signs that
predict the end of humanity.
At least in the form
currently known and active.
Japan is thoroughly
intoxicated with the West.
It can not see thorugh its
"magical"( 'magick') tricks for what they really are.
Rather it sees the West as a
"Magic Lamp" or 'Light'/Lux of guidance and a goal to be approached.
Not even being aware that
the West is not taking its attempts or even its presence ( Japan )
seriously.....
It ( Japan ) is a creature on the verge of
expiration and to be pitied for not being aware of what it has really throuwn
out and lost, and what kind of "Naked Emperor/Empress" it has replaced
that with..
It is joyfully heading towards extinction as it drags the
rest of nature here along with it...