"Recovering from an Illness called Western Civilization"

Monthly Article for the "Natural Medicine" magazine under the series titled "Saving Earth-The Natural Medical Way of Dr.Morishita XII"

 

 

「地球を救ふ 森下自然医学XII

 

Feb. edition 2005
By: Ryu Ohta

Translation date: Feb. 28th 2005
Translator: Grace-Eki

 
 
   "My name is Chellis & I’m in Recovery from Western Civilization" (1994)  This is the title of a book by Chellis Glendinning PhD who is an American Eco-psychologist.
This is a book that is both fun and unique.

On the cover of the book there is a photograph of her in some Indian reserve of New Mexico State (or at least that is the image of the photograph as she stands alone among the rocks and sand and open skyline.

Not only is this woman aware that Western civilization is an illness, but is quite conscious of the fact that Western civilization is dangerous, fatal and toxic not just for mankind but for all creatures of Earth and that each one of us must wake up from this morbid illusion and do whatever one can to remedy this situation with urgency.

She is exceedingly lucid.

"Since Columbus arrived in North America, a full 75 percent of the wildwood ecosystem has been wiped out.  Originally, 95 percent of western and central Europe was covered with lush forestland, from the Black Forest to the Italian Alps; that amount is now 20 percent.  Ten thousand years China was 70 percent forest; today it is 5 percent.  ..........." (pg.48)

 
Japan does not seem to exist in her perspective.
It is a well-known fact (for the Japanese, obviously) that
Japan still maintains two-thirds of herself as forest.
This is an exception among the so -called "civilized" or industrialized countries.
The reason why is also out of her perspective.

             "By far the greatest damage we do to Earth, and thus by far the greatest threat to our
            survival, comes from agriculture." (pg.69)

 This is a statement by James Lovelock-a biologist. Whereas Jared Diamond of UCLA Medical School has declared. That agriculture is to be "the worst mistake in the history of human race."
Agriculture as understood here points to the technique utilized about from ten thousand years ago in the area of so called "cradle of civilization".
It is a combined technique both of cultivating natural-wild plants and taming animals into domestication.
Chellis Glendinning not only accepts these observations but goes even further and asserts the damage this process of "domestication" has brought unto the human race.
This is a major step forward for a Westerner.


"In captivity, she writes (Eco-feminist Adele Getty), male animals proved to be too wild and uncontrollable; the use of the word break to describe the domestication process is revealing. To answer the problems of this unforeseen predicament, the men sliced off the animals’ male organs.......

The brutal acts of castration had to have a dramatic impact on the male psyche.  The reverberations of this impact are visible even today in Freud’s castration anxiety and are unconsciously reenacted again and again, as traumatic themes so often are, in the religiomedical procedure of circumcision in rape, in sadomasochistic acts, and in sexual violence."(pg.80)

 So the beginning roots of trauma lies here.

 "One thing about these societies is certain: like their agricultural brothers, pastoral men took control of their food production-....by breaking the animals, and in so doing they traumatized themselves".

This is an incredibly astute observation.
But this dark, deep abyss within the psychological fathom of the Western mind, is hard for a Japanese tc comprehend.
According to the archeologists, this technique of domesticating animals came during the KOFUN
period (4th to 7th century A.D.)  from the mainland continent via the Korean peninsula.
Despite that, until Post Restoration-the beginning of Meiji era when the Western Satanism wedged into Japanese society, this technique of castration (for the male domesticated animals) was unknown/not utilized.
It is an incredible factor.  For the castration of the males in order to control the reproduction and make the herd more malleable, this is the basis and the initial foundation for the process for the "domestication".
Only by this castration technique could the step from pastoral to a stable and controlled livestock management be obtained and maintained.
The sheep, after a year in existence would be chosen and selected either for castration or for breeding.
The castrated organs of the sheep is said to become one of the stable food source (after being sun-dried) for the pastoral people.
A certain Rabbi who is well informed about
Japan has made the following statement.
Anthropological progress can be understood as thus;

            I)             hunting-gathering stage
            II)           followed by the pastoral
           III)           then agricultural
          IV)         
and finally industrial

But Japan does not have the number II process.  It goes from I to III.
This is a major flaw for the Japanese civilization.  That was his critique.
This is an accurate observation...
Pastoral stage is the entrance into the process for the "domestication" of wildlife.
Japanese history would prove that there was a voluntary self-restraint to avoid this stage.

These English words; "Pastor, Pastoral" is used in Christianity for the priest (or any psychological/mental guide-leader) and in many Western expressions as a period of peace, greenery and nostalgia.

 

Breaking (Castrating) a live animal -this leads straight to Genetic Engineering

  According to the dictionary, pastoral people are those whose life style is nomadic; moving wherever, in search for water and alimentation for their herd-can be found. The traditional prototype chosen has been the sheep.
The key to their successful management lies in the castration process of the males.
In other words, it is the destruction of their reproductive capability.
It is to render them impotent.
This occurs not just in the West, but also in Islam and Judaism. In short wherever monotheistic God is deeply rooted, so has this procedure.
This technique is nothing exclusive for the animal world but can easily be utilized for the human race as well.
Japanese tradition has often embraced foreign influence with open arms but this is one (among others-see the Article # 1 for more details) that never became adopted here.
Pastoral progress=Castration technique did not became the basis of Japanese culture and it should not be the foundation on which a civilization should be constructed.
To break an animal implies destructing, impounding, cutting, tearing, beating etc; all very similar to how the Stone Age mechanism functioned.
In this case it is not about ripping the flesh off a dead animal but more about destroying alive an entire species’ biological mechanism.
>From that point of view to genetic engineering it is conceptually a straight line.
Although there may have been pockets of resistance, doubts, search or recommendation for other alternatives and so forth-fundamentally form the birth of
Mesopotamia about ten thousand years ago ‘til this day and age the same mentality and attitude prevails both towards Nature and animalkind.
This whole procedure is labeled the "Western Civilization".
Japan translated this word as Bunmei but it was a mistake arising from misunderstanding –or better yet by not comprehending the West in all its entirety, which continues even to this day.
The opposite of civilization/culture is defined as "wild", but this is an utterly blind assumption.
The fundamental assumption of Western civilization is to conquer and subdue Nature.
The correct opposite term for this civilization is actually Nature or nature.
In order to conquer Nature one must "break"-destroy.
And who is going to be the hero-protagonist for such an endeavour?
That leads to the question of who is leading mankind in that direction-for it is so contrary to both logic and instinct of mankind. Or it should be.
There are two dogmas in the West that enables this to proceed.
One is that there is an all mighty God, the Creator who created all this of the world.
And man or Man or even men- has been given the permission to be his representative here on earth.
to dominate and control all in his name/glory.
The other is that as mankind "progressed", he himself became equal to the Creator or should proceed in that direction.
The former is old-fashioned, passé For the last five hundred years, ever since the Renaissance, mankind has adopted the latter’s dogma and has even killed him off to occupy his throne... This dogma is labeled Humanism, -Man as the Centre of Universe.

 

Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering-Rockefeller’s Enthusiastic Support Enabled Them

"Currently those who are deploying biotechnologies (geneticists and corporate managers) tend to share one view of nature-the "cybernetic chemical factory" view, which is fundamental reductionistic, mechanistic, materialist perspective.

Certainly, for the purpose of philosophical discussion, they have every right to such a view.  However, when they propose actions that affect all of us, including many non-human species, shouldn’t we explore alternative lines of thought?"

"Cloning the Buddha: The Moral Impact of Biotechnology" First Quest Edition 1999 (pg. 74)

 

The contemporary Western scientific mentality probably is as Richard Heinberg states.

If life (or nature) is understood as "Cybernetic chemical factory", one must inquire who is the one controlling and enabling the computer’s function?

Those must be the scientists as they sit in the lab of the Creator, followed by those corporate chairmen who feel they own the scientists and the financial oligarchs who actually pull the string of those research grants.

According to Lily Kay (historian of science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in her book "The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology" (Oxford University Press 1993) states – as from Heinberg’s book pg.34-35. Since 1930’s the Rockefeller Foundation –funded everything, and around that time established a new science, molecular biology.
The main points are as follows; (this was written for the Japanese public)

1)       The Rockefellers or the Foundation wanted to establish a new biological scientific fiels of research based on eugenics.

2)       For that they hired the physicists Max Mason and Warren Weaver.

3)       These two had an intense dislike for quantum physics and embraced the Newtonian mechanics as an absolute.

4)       They adopted the reductionistic simplified view that genes determine and program all

5)       The Foundation by sheer economic power not only funded them but reorganized and hired professors, researchers, scientist, students, the university administrators etc. to suit their dogma/agenda.

6)       Simultaneously, social sciences and studies were funded in such a way to pave the way towards the concept that society’s problems are/were essentially genetically based and can be solved via molecular biology

7)       Scientists sponsored by the Foundation started to dominate the Nobel prizes and later went on to occupy high positions within the scientific academia as well as research centers within the States

8)       Hence there became born a kind of social wind that researching within the field of molecular biology gave one financial security or easy-easier cash.

9)       Post WWII the human pool established by the Foundation went on to enter into governmental positionsor became involved with governmental projects.

The rest is history as one would say.......

 

The Principle of Eugenics, first applied to Domesticated Animals, then applied to Humans for the Same Motive

 Currently the world accepts certain theories as the "norm", or the correct socially accepted approach of science as applicable to the Human world:

1)       Post WWII appearance of Erwin Schrodinger’s (a physicist) classical work titled 「生命とは何か」(approximate translation-"What is Life?") about molecular biology.

2)       In the 1950’s (1953 to be exact) the geniuses J.D.Watson and F.H.C.Crick released their Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid model.

3)       Then the whole field of research regarding life sciences became enamoured and totally imbued with molecular biological and the eugenics approach towards research.

Whatever other approach and techniques utilized prior became old fashioned and no longer meritorious for consideration.
What are missing from this overall view are the crucial 1) to 9) steps as researched by Lilly Kay.
The most important basis has not been clarified.
Then suddenly –we have an appearance of men like E.Schrodinger whose influence becomes monumental and domineering.
Once when one researches behind the scene, then social gatherings like the Nobel Prize Awards etc.does lose its prestige and awe.  It starts to appear almost like a criminal gathering as the major motive appears not to be the research for truth, as much as a means of propaganda- to impress and mold the public’s perception i.e. brain-washing so the world shares a common basis of thought as designed by somebody else.
The problem lies in the concept of this word "Eugenics".
The part "eu" comes from the Greek root –to mean good, moral, and beautiful and so forth, combined with the other Greek word "genos" for race; so possibly either coined or taken from the Greek, to mean "well-born". Eugenia –incidentally means, in Greek "nobility of birth".
So "Eugenics"    this word appears to have entered English around 1883 and was coined by Sir Francis Galton.
A crucial point to remember is the fact that he is cousin to Charles Darwin, and this is at the height of British Imperialism.

          "He defined it as "the study of the agencies under social control which may improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations mentally or physically"-the way plant and animal breeders improve their stock.  In essence, eugenics means the application of scientific breeding techniques to human beings" (ibid. pg.174)

  As Juvenal so eloquently asked "Quis custodiet ipsos custodies?"
The problem lies with who will be the judge as to define human beauty, superiority....
The difference between "eugenic" and "dysgenic" genes.....?
Then there is the problem that the Central Dogma of Eugenics, this genetic determinism has yet to be proven scientifically.  That this is more like a cult ideology.Whatever research and "proofs" (in an experimental sense) contradictory or even not compatible with the Dogma has been quietly swept under the carpet, never to see the public sunshine.British biologists Dr. John Cairns and colleagues at Harvard Universities in 1988 and later replicated by Dr. Barry Hall of Rochester University- among others, utilizing the E.coli species.

 "This adaptive response (of the E.coli bacteria) was different from anything that could be attributed to purely random mutation and selection; Cairns concluded that a "directed mutation" appeared to be occurring, and that "populations of bacteria ........have some way of producing (or selectively retaining) only the most appropriate mutations"............In a separate experiment, Barry Hall started with a strain of E.coli.......He later commented
 "I can document (directed mutations) any day, every day, in the laboratory" (pg.50-51)

 If one accepts the presence of a "directed mutation", then the Neo-Darwinistic evolutionary biological approach of the contemporary Western world science, along with the cult of genetic determinism becomes invalid. Meaning that the whole paradigm must be dissolved.

 

The Real Motor/Motivating Force of the western Civilization=A Perpetual War Against Nature 

 A forcible tyrant of illogic-that seems to be the behaviour of modern natural science in the West i.e. all over the world....wherever there is Western civilization.
This is not an isolated phenomena or sheer coincidence (random act of mutation?)
But a linear, logical consequence stemming from the castration procedure of "domestication".
This act of violence leads to more.
The essence of the problem lies in the attitude of arrogance, that hubris of "ordering" Nature around.
So what happens when and if Nature does not obey?
Needless to say the answer is by force.  The end justifies the means approach, calling for an eternal war against disobedience.
That is the essence of Western civilization. 
War is not shadow-boxing.  It is not a solitary affair.
There has to be the other side, the vanquished and victim to receive this force of folly.
And this war, the frontier line of attack widens by the minutes.
Hence Western people or least the elite commanders of the West are in perpetual tension of the "victory or death" syndrome.
If one searches a comparative period in Japan of this mentality, it would the middle period of Ashikaga Bakufu-regime with the Ounin no-Ran (1467-1477) and through the Sengoku-Jidai  smack around the time the Jesuit Xavier landed, lasting about hundred ten, twenty years.
(The approximation would be the transitory period between the fifteenth to the sixteenth century, till 1590 with Tokugawa taking power or till 1600 with the battle of Sekiga-Hara).

The other time would be from the appearance of Commodore Perry (1853), passing the Meiji Restoration 'til present.
I was sincerely surprised and shocked to find out some historical incidents erased out form history through a book by a contemporary writer/researcher Onizuka Hideaki
鬼塚 英昭
These are from his book "The Rosary of the Showa Emperor"
「天皇のロザリオ」(published Oct, 28th 2004).
This is from the correspondence between the Portuguese King João III and the
Vatican Pope of the period.

 

"Japan would exchange a barrel of gunpowder for fifty slaves. (In this case it would be specified as white-skinned (light skinned) good –looking (pleasing to the eyes) young Japanese women/maidens) In the name of God, if Japan can be occupied/possessed I am sure the price can be increased."  (pg, 255)

 
「天正少年使節圑」(A group of young diplomats/messenger-boys sent as the country representative during the Tensho reime)
This 天正(tensho) period would correspond roughly to 1573-1585 A.D.
It was during this period that the Catholic Feudal Lords like Ootomo
, Oomura , Arima  and others of Kyushu , Southern part of Japan sent a group of young men as messengers for the Pope at the Vatican(1582).
This is from the report they sent back to
Japan:
"Everywhere we go, we encounter many Japanese women.  It is said that there are five hundreds thousands of these women in
Europe.  White skinned and good looking Japanese women, chained while their private parts are exposed, played around by men (white), and sold as slaves to other various
countries, is a sight not to be ignored.
   This custom of enchaining their fellow men and carrying them off to faraway places to be sold, is hard to comprehend for after all are they not originally part of the same white civilization (white-raced , would be more accurate).... 
The Portuguese church associates exchange them for limestone ( a necessary ingredient for gun-powder), and they are sold in places as far as
India or Africa"

 

 

 



 
 
 
 

 

 
                                                                      4 boys between the ages of 13-14, returning after 8 yrs to Japan.

 Francisco Xavier first appeared in Japan in 1549.
So it is only just 30 to 40 years time span when all this occurred.
It is exceedingly lucky that Hideyoshi(Toyotomi) and Ieyasu (Tokugawa) and Iemitsu (Tokugawa) put a stop to this malevolent flow entering
Japan.
But what to do next, now....
It is so blatantly clear that the Western civilization is an assault on Nature.
A perpetual war that is gaining speed because of "technology", and would in the end demolish itself to extinction, but all the while dragging along the rest of the existence of this whole planet.

Japan must say "Sayonara" to this ill-omen.
A direct path of shortcut is already shown by Mosishita’s way of "Natural Medicine".