The Uniqueness of the Japanese Language

From the book  "15,000 Years of Jyomon Civilization" (published in July 20th, 2003 by Seiko Shobo)

Chapter 3

JYOMON CIVILIZATION

The Japanese Language and the Uniqueness of the "Japanese"(language -based) Brain

 

Going Against the Current Flow of so-called "Western Civilization"---

The Recognition towards an independent 'Japanese Culture and Civilization'

 

  When was that recognition born, that Japan may have its own so called civilization,- in the context of division as in the defining and differentiating between and among the Western, Chinese or Indian civilization.

 In 1942, in the January edition of the monthly magazine 「日本評論」 Nippon Hyou Ron or the "Critique of/on Japan" magazine, appeared an article by長谷川 如是閑 Hasegawa Nyouzekan

titiled "The Sea and Japan-the Original Initial Roots of the Japanese Civilization".

「海と日本ー日本文明の淵源 について」

 An ambitious attmep;t at explaining the orgins of all civilizations of the planet, as an initial attempt at organizing the aquatic transportation attempts.  The basic premise for this is the necessity of water and means of a water based tranportaion.  Hence Egypt has the Nile, Sumer -the Mesopotamia, Indus Valley with its river, the Yellow River Civilization of China-黄河 as the name implies, both the Phoenicians and the Greeks-the Mediterranean, then the Venetian as well as the British had similar sea-routes, Portugal and Spain had both the Mediterranean and the Atlantic.  All shared the same backbone of aquatic transportation as their basis for growth.

  Japan has aspects similar to ancient Greece, but fundamentally they are both fundamnetally unlike in the basic premises to each other. The Greek (and later Roman) civilization was based on "the polis", while Japan's  seems to have grown more heterogeneously with less major distinction among them.  More like a conglomeration of rural villages.....

「西洋の都市が城壁をもって圍まれ、 日本 都市が城壁を持たないのも、日本では都市と都市外の地方との文明に境界がないことを象徴している」

Hasegawa states thus that "unlike the Western polis, there is no major wall of division in Japan between the inside and outside, signifying that there is no distinct civilization within a certain defined perimeter but rather diffused and blended through out Japan.."

「初期において支那文明、 大陸文明の継承 に似てゐたであろうが、奈良から平安初期にかけて、 大陸のそれから獨立するに至った」

Initially (the Japanese culture) was under the influence of China and demonstrated many signs of a "land-mass"/continent characteristics, but by the time from Nara, and Heian period this influence was no longer recognizable, but has

 

「戦国末期たは『南蛮 蠻』噴火の影響を受 けたが、 徳川中期に至って、 平安時代以来の

純日本的な文化形態をあらゆる方面において 創造した」

 

-also "For three thousand years they have managed to develop their culture uninterrupted and unhindered by outside influence.  That is a feat of accomplishment one can be proud of."

「 三千年来、些かの中断すらなしにその純一の文明系統を持続せしめ得たことを誇り得る」

 Plus they attempted to and managed "to unify both the political and the cultural into one blend".  「政治園と文明園の完全な一致を見るに至った」

And Hasegawa also states:

「太平洋における皇軍大捷快報瀕りに至日、 端しなく此の橋を起こした」

We have managed to create a bridging of this culture through our Imperial Navy all across the Atlantic ocean.

These words were penned down at the apex of Anti-Western mentality and an attempt to rebel against the enclosing encroachment of that culture.  It is understandable that such a period would produce a reawakening for the defining or redefining of the Japanese culture by another yard stick contrary to the one imported/imposed by the West.

 Yet it is of interest that Hasegawa (1875-1969) has received the Chrysanthemum Medal for Culture in post-war year of 1948. Meaning that he is a very "status quo" mainstream scholar.

 I have not researched if Hasegawa, prior to this article of 1942 has ever made attempts to solely define and differentiate the Japanese culture from others.

 But it in not hard, in retrospect to see how his work evolved by researching prior attmepts before his, in the history of Japan.

 

First of all we have writers (or better defined- official custodians or historians)  like Hirata Atsutane  平田 驚胤 and O-kuni Takamasa 大国 隆正in that transition period from Tokugawa feudalism to Meiji Restoration period.

These people reflecting the zeitgeist of the period, attempted like Motoi Nobunaga 本居 宣長

to throw the "Chinese" yoke off and to assimilate what was then available about the West via the "East India Company" as to create and justify their own theory about the superiority of Japan.  Or better yet not 日本 but Sumeramikuni すめらみくに 皇国。 But they had a problem.  They didn't know Dutch, nor any Western language.  Without knowing and researching the original manuscripts of the West, how could they possibly formulate a proper theory equal to and even superior to the West... It was an utterly futile attempt. Hence their inspiration and enthusiasm appeared and disappeared equally precipitously.

  After an intense Westernization of the initial Meiji decade, the second decade of Meiji saw the pendulum swing the other way towards a nationalistic approach.

But by the third decade of the Meiji era, the elite who had been immersed in the Western style education started to occupy the main body of every governmental branch.  By the Taisho period that velenous(poison) immersion spread to the middle-class. With the aid of the Jewish Babylonian Hollywood imagery, even the masses succumbed to a kind of mental trap of "enchantment ", towards the West.

 There was a second attempt at Restoration at the beginning of the Showa period with people like Kawazura Bonji 川面 凡児  Imaizumi Sadasuke今泉 定助 from the Shinto world, and

Kokujyukai 国柱会(a Society)   Inoue Nitsushou   井上日召    Kita Itsuki    北 一輝from the Buddhistic  and both groups attempted to revive and re-direct the course of Showa history.

Their effrot was to emphasis once again revitalize the mentalite of traditional Japan.

The result of these efforts can be seen by the fact that the Ministry of Education  sent out pamphlets to people related to the educational fields, titled "The Dogmatic Principles of Homeland"「国体の本義」 國體would be the original kanji of the period. This explored

This occurred in 1936.

In other words by the time Showa became established and大東亜戦争war (later on all this process would be labeled under the title of World War II) started, Japan already have accumulated over eighty years of Western influence. 

Hence it was the accumulation of three generations of Westernization with the elite taking hold of all the major posts of influence within Japan where this period emerged.

This man Hasegawa was given the Chrysanthemum Cultural Medal in 1948, making him without doubt, a product of pro -Anglo/American liberal intellectualism.  It is worth scrutinizing what motivated really deep down for a man of that inclination/influence to start defining or re-defining Japan and its civilization, and from what point of view was it that he be so inclined to decide and judge.

 

 

 THE ARCHEOLOGIUCAL REVOLT AGAINST the POST WORLD WAR II ADORATION of the WEST

Showa 12 (1937)   Kouda Rohan幸田 露伴for literature, Sasaki Nobutsuna                  佐々木信綱for studies on the National/Japanese language

Showa  15  (1940)    Nishida Kitaro西田幾多郎for philosophy

Showa  18  (1943)   Tokutomi Sohou徳富蘇峰 for Critique, Miyake Setsurei三宅雪嶺for history and mythology

Showa  19  (1944)   Takakusu Jyunjiro高楠順次郎  for Studies on Buddhism

Showa  21  (1946)   Iwanami Shigeo岩波茂雄ー the founder of the Iwanami Publishing House

Showa  23  (1948)   Hasagawa  Nyozekan長谷川始是閑for Critique

Showa   24  (1949)  Tsuda Soukichi津田 左右吉 for history, Suzuki Daisetsu鈴木 大拙for Reserch in Buddhism,  Shiga Naoya志賀 直哉for literature

Showa  25  (1950)  Doi Bansui土井晩翠for literature,  Tanabe Hajime 田辺 元for philosophy,  Masamune Hakucho正宗 白鳥for literature and so forth....

 

 Observing the list of these prominent people who had received the Chrysanthemum Medal, one becomes aware of the fact that most of them have been born in the time of transition between the ending Tokugawa feudalism and the early part of the Meiji Restoration.  It is a time of great transition for Japan as Western influence seemed to be on the verge of inundating and completely engulfing Japan, yet somehow managed to stop itself on the brink and managed not to perish but to accumulate and digest these alien aspects and to transcend and still survive and actually grow on them. 

  There have been people like the writer Shiga  志賀直哉 who proclaimed that the Japanese language was too outdated and better to adopt the French language as the national language of Japan.  He earned himself a rather negative fame with this comment.

Post World War II and its subsequent Occupation, finds Japan having its past history completely blackened; a logical and predictable sequence of the victor and the vanquished.  Hence the unbridled adoration of all things Western, including not just the obvious capitalism of the Victor's but the so called "enemy of the West" -U.S.S.R styled communism of Marx and Lenin.

  But despite all that and the defeat of WWII, came a revival of all things Japanese.

And that occurred from a quite unexpected direction, that of archeology.

Archeology is an off-shoot of modern science, occurring (most actively in England) around the 17th century.  Until then, whether in the history of the West, or in others like Asia (India, China or Japan) or the pre-colonial history of the Central and South America, one does not find a similar field of research.

But if one insists, one can go back to the Hellenistic Empire time of Alexander "Magnus", when the Greeks came up with the list of the Seven Wonders of the World.  A world of empire based all around the Mediterranean and reaching as far as India came up with the following decision as to what was an accomplishment worthy of fame/value for posterity.. 

The generally agreed upon seven wonders of that period and within the area of Alexander's conquest were, (and still are of wonder and mystery even today) are:

1) the Giza Pyramids of Egypt

2) the hanging garden of Babylon

3) the temple of Artemis at Ephesus (Turkey)

4) the statue of Zeus at Olympia, Greece

5) the Mausoleum in Turkey

6) the statue of Helios at the Isle of Rhodes

7) the light-house of Alessandria in Egypt

The only "wonder" still standing today are the pyramids of Egypt.

The others have disappeared due to neglect/ time or have been purposely destroyed.

Either way, for whatever reason, not a trace is left now.

The common essence of these structures may be the fact that they are all ancient megaliths/monoliths.

Come 15-16th century, when Christianized Europe starts off its attempt at global domination (

a scenario of slavery for the rest of 'mankind' and the rape and pillaging of 'others').

Hence War and wars start in all earnest.

Their weapon is the Bible and the Military.

The military is supported by the latest scientific technical innovations.

First they dominate the black natives of the neighbouring upper African continent, followed by central and southern natives of the American continent. 

They proceed in the other direction as soon as their navigational capabilities are capable, via the Indian ocean towards the Pacific.

They rapidly subdue, vanquish, demolish the native Islanders and then proceed back towards the continent as of South- East Asia and India.

They implant their global political vision and its system, 'geo-politics' on a world wide scale.

Their basis are the Alexandrian Seven Wonders and they spread their theory on a global scale, replacing the local traditional history with the concept of "archeology".

 

The governmental policy of the Meiji Restoration doers were that of a total acceptance and importation of Western scientific technology.  Archeology being a part of the package, Morse is imported to be the first transmitter of this trend.

Morse, for a start initiates the excavation of the area around the Tokyo University.

Lo and behold, artifactsafter artifacts appeared and this is said to be the beginning of the research for the 'Yayoi' ceramics.

 

The premises of archeology corresponds to the basis of 'modern scientific research'.

A rough sketch of the usual procedure would be as following:

1) regarding the excavation a minute recording of the whole process would be kept and released to the scientific/archeological research community.

2) whatever that has been excavated would be kept in either a museum or some municipal centre and accessible for future research, and further scrutiny of related researchers as well as to the general or limited public.

3) It is crucial that the object(s) would chronologically identified/classified to the most precise date as possible.

4) an attempt to revive the than current condition of the circumstance when the object was created or disposed of, based on the most scientific conjecture available at the time

5) this process would require both tremendous time and money.  That is supposedly made possible by grants from universities, governmental agencies, research institutes etc.

6) degrees in archeology would be created as to enable both the education of the future researchers as well as to keep the current research functioning. and the interest alive....

 

This kind of structure was created around the 17th century with the birth of 'Royal Academy of Science'.  The famous 'British Museum' is an off-shoot from the Society.

This was followed in France, Prussia, Russia and so forth with their own Academies and this influence spread throughout Europe.

 

 So Morse made an investigative report that will be released around the other Societies and this became the beginning of 'archeology' in and of Japan.

In other words Japan imported the procedure, the concept -the whole nine yards- about archeology and about Japan and started its research based on those rails laid down by the West.

 Archeology would later emerge and share aspects of their research into various branches of sciences like anthropology, biology, geology and even with cosmology.  This has been the inclination of the past two hundred years (19th-20th.centuries)

 

In Western archeology there is no separate concept/ category as of a "Ceramics/Artifactual/Pottery Period"?

In Japanese it is expressed as土器時代.

It is not that ceramics does not appear.  Its position is that of a secondary, tertiary significance.  It can not be accepted as a gauge for a civilization.

From their eyes civilization proceeded in the following categorization;

Stone Age- Metal Age (Bronze Age, Iron Age etc.)

 

The Bronze Age 

Abroad- it starts about 5,6000 years ago but in Japan it started only about two thousand and few hundred years ago. Making it-this process about approximately three thousand years later than some parts of the world.

Abroad- it reached its apex about/over two thousand years ago, but in Japan it only arrived at that era about two thousand years ago.  Hence about a thousand and few hundred years behind.

 

Analyzed from this angle Japan would be in the "under-developed" classification.

Hence in the category of primitive civilization.

The developed civilization, i.e. the West or China, invaded and subdued the indigenous primitive natives.  This is the accepted standard concept of history.  The birth or the creation of an identity known as Japan was created by the domination of "civilized" foreigners/aliens across the sea.  By following this premise it makes logical sense that the ancestors of what is known as Japan, as well as all the "Emperor " concepts and myths must have also comes from abroad.

 As the Japanese archeologists went excavating around Japan using these Western concepts as the tool of analysis, they encountered an inexplicable enigma.  They found artifacts that appeared different to and older to that Yayoi, the Jyomon ceramics.

So now came the dilemma of how to properly place these artifacts within the paradigm of  Western history, history of China, plus the history of Japan as expressed in 古事記Kojiki、日本書紀Nihon Shoki.

 

So scholars and researchers came up with the following placements:

Jyomon Period: Hunting/Gathering society of wandering indigenous people

Yayoi Period: the first successful attempt towards agriculture and thus a stable society, therefore the dawn of civilization.

After WWII with the domination of the allies, the "Emperorial" role in the creation of original Japan became diminished, the bringers of Yayoi civilization became definitely placed in the category of "foreigners" or as the bringer of civilization (and light?).

 And the creation of Japan by gods as noted in the history of Japan became not even a fact of mythology but more of an object not worthy of consideration.  Since no scientific basis can be found, it should become eliminated became the general consensus.

Only what is mentioned about Japan in the history of China中国正史should be accepted as legitimate history of Japan, and the history of Japan re-examined from that point of view.

 The Jyomon natives were eliminated (most likely) by the more advanced Yayoi invaders and disappeared without a trace was the standard accepted premise for a long time.

Following this yard-stick , Jinmu Emperor 神武 'til the tenth Sujin Emperor崇神were mythological characters and historically non-existent.

From the 11th until the 14th Emperor there are no concrete records that can be cited as 'proof' of existence.

Only with the 15th Emperor is there a mention in the Chinese historical records as 「讃」 who would turn out to be the Oujin Emperor.     But it may be about the 16th Nintoku Emperor仁徳or so it is said..  Things depend on the interpretation..

 

 At any rate given the current inclination, the West may finally succeed in totally demolishing the Japanese myths and history, and consequently Japan itself may be on the verge of total extinction.  Or so it appeared- but just as it tethered on the verge, came a reversal of incidents that revived this dying identity.

  That was the discovery and development in the interest, of the Japanese Jyomon archeology.

Hasegawa Nyozekan ( 長谷川 如是閑) stated thus:
   "而して、この原始からの日本文明の独自の系統は、絶えず大陸文明を摂取しつ つ、三千年の長い間に栽培さねつつ、その純粋の血脈を今日につづけているのである。。。。。啻にわれわれ現代の日本人が、古い祖先からの伝統 傳統 精神 を持ち続けてゐることを示すだけではなく、

それによって、今日の日本の國家としての生 存の条件が、三千年前の古代日本のそれと、その根本性質において同じものであることを知り得るのである。。。。。。。

他本文名の特徴である自主性が、年を積むに 従って有力となり、模倣性に於いて一歩進めば、

それと同時に、自主性に於いて一歩進めると いう歴史を持ち続けてきた。    。。。。。。

いかなる外国の力も、いかなる世界史の動き も、 この三千年の海の日本の歴史を中断せしめる力をもたないのはいふまでもないことである"

 

 Hasegawa speaks about the three thousand years of Japanese history.

1940, Showa 15 implies 'Emperial' age 2600, by relying on the inscriptions of Nihon Shoki, and counting the first Emperor Jinmu as the beginning point.

2600 was a common point of reference at that period.  But notice that Hasegawa states "three thousand years of history".  That would imply about the middle of the Jyomon civilization.

Archeologists of his time does not accept the 'mythical'-Emperial calendar. At least not deep down in their thinking.. They found it as a bothersome anomaly....

Jyomon civilization as measured by the Western archeological paradigm would mean a group of  hunting /gathering primitive barbarians, hence far away from 'civilization'.

 

FROM ANCIENT TIMES THE BLOOD, CULTURE and CIVILIZATION OF JAPAN WAS ONE- a statement form OKAMOTO TARO 岡本太郎

 

 That assumption is shifting before our eyes now

It was Okamoto Taro that jolted out attention towards Jyomon.

Okamoto Taro, is a well known artist and the product of Okamoto Istupei and Kanoko, a notoriously well known couple of the early Taisho period.  Taro was raised in a very eclectic and unique manner and was sent to study abroad .  He was based in Paris and got to know many of the later well known artists like Picasso. He spent more than a decade being thoroughly immersed in the avant-garde West of the time, and returned to Japan during World War II period..-in other words a thoroughly Westernized creature.

During the Showa 30's or around 1955 onwards, he encounters Jyomon artifacts, and almost over night he transformed himself from adoring and idolizing the West into re-evaluating all around him again.(or all of his surrounding culture...)-

and he came to feel reverence for the Japanese/Jyomon style.

This was a major act that changed the course of history as any other so called 'revolutionary' acts.  It was not just an act of a passing trend or of influencing temporal fashion.

 

Okamoto Taro, he threw a stone.

And that stone produced a ripple.

 

A ripple that was to reach and resonate in the innermost depth of the souls of these lost and apathetic post WWII Japanese people.

The Japanese people managed to find the original primitive home'  for their souls.

Many prominent Japanese were influenced by Okamoto's eulogy of the Jyomon.

One of the foremost example of that may be the poet Sou Sakon 宗 左近.

 

The philosopher Umehara Takeshi梅原 猛states that Japan (Eastern Japan) had two centres of civilization; one, that of the hunting/ gathering  Jyomon culture and two, that of the agricultural Yayoi culture.  This is the楕円国家

 Outwardly it appears as though the more technically advanced Yayoi civilization vanquished and eliminated the Jyomon but it was not so.  It was not so.  The roots of the Japanese heart, its mentality, the soul, the basis of its religion are all Jyomon - rooted in reality-the cotidien existence of the people. .

 

 And in the field of Jyomon archeological excavations there came an incredible and totally unexpected discovery in the Aomori prefecture known as "SANAI MARU YAMA" 「三内丸遺跡」 archeological site.  The research and excavation was initiated in 1992, 40 years post the historical statement made by Okamoto Taro.   

Around the middle of Jyomon period, (approximately 5500-4000 ago) there appears to have been, contrary to all expectations and assumptions a stable, non-nomadic and highly sophisticated and competent aggregation of people lived for a time span of over 1500 years there.  Hence former assumption about the Jyomon toppled over. 

 For more interested readers, details can be obtained from Takashima高島忠平 and Okada's 岡田 康博 joint venture in the 「縄文の宇宙、 弥生の世界」page 10, published by Kadokawa Shoten 角川書店 2000)

The new interpretation is taking roots so sooner or later it should appear and be incorporated into the educational textbooks where issues related to ancient Japan occurs.

 

   "The traditional assumption about the Jyomon civilization was that fundamentally post Yayoi

 it no longer had anything to do with Japan or the Japanese culture and no connection         existed once Yayoi culture flourished.  That has beeen the axiomatic assumption when dealing with issues related to Japanese antiquity.   Among the actual researchers there has been doubts towards that assumption, and there had been shifts in the interpretation but it is with Okamoto Taro's exclamation that "Jyomon is Art" that elevated both the status and interest 

in the Jyomon artifacts. He endorsed the ethnical vivacity that the Jyomon artifacts are capable of triggering in the views and elevated their formerly marginalized position into the main stream within the history of art of Japan. "

 

"There has been a great change in the position of the Jyomon period post WWII"

 

"It is also possible that as the position of Japan rose post WWII into the international community, Japanese culture finally appeared in the cultural history of the world as autonomous and separate, something worthy of mention."    Statements made by Tahashima Chuhei .

 

Hence traditional concept of history was:

Jyomon→completely demolished and exterminated, had nothing to do with later history of Japan

Yayoi→with their irrigation based agricultural as well as metallurgical capabilities, came across the sea to populate Japan.  Hence this was the ancestral basis of Japan.

But currently, starting about a 100 years ago and especially in the last 50 years of post WWII with further archeological research, the understanding has become:

Stone Age-- Jyomon-- Yayoi →current populace

Meaning that the ethnicity and culture of Japan has been one and unified.

 

 

"FINGERPRINTS OF GODS" ARE GRAHAM'S FINGERPRINTS on the RIGHT SPOTS

 

In the year 2000 Graham Hancock was here in Japan for six weeks, researching and investigating Jyomon excavation sites.

He stated in an interview that although hardly known outside of Japan, he positions Jyomon as one of the most important cultural site in the history of world antiquity.

"Sunday Mainichi"Newspaper 2000 June 11th issue

12,000 years ago, there was a major upheaval (cosmic-oriented) that changed the shape/face of earth. and all civilizations have said to have perished.  But Japan with its Jyomon beings not only witnessed the upheaval, but survived through and its culture endured 'til now. Or so it appears to be and that is what Hancock conjectures.

"If Jyomon culture is not known outside of Japan, it is because that the Japanese people have underestimated its significance and never made any public statements related to that....   That seal may become broken through Hancock.  For a culture that has managed to last for more than 12,000 with its roots intact, well then that culture does deserve all the scrutiny and attention for such an uniqueness and longevity."

 Here it is written that the Japanese underestimated it.

And now an English writer is going to break its seal, and herald it internationally...

It is annoying to be generalized so quickly and lumped under the word "Japanese".

Who undervalued the Japanese culture?

First the Japanese ruling elite with their reverence to China.

Next the same group mentality of the Japanese oligarchy with their reverence to the West.

Both not just sought to underestimate, but to literally demolish and cast out what has always been uniquely Japanese.

Look at the currently ruling class elite in the finance, politics, media, where ever there is influence, visibility- when undervaluing continues to the point of non-existence, extermination- then the consequence is that these people are psychologically geared to up-root i.e. exterminate, all things genuinely Japanese.

 

 

 

 

The China-immersed intellectuals, the West-revering elites may say that, well it is an artifact of a long, long time ago anyway. Relics of the past made form mud, and what practical value would it render to my life anyway....

 

But here there is something utterly crucial that can be proven even now.

The Japanese language.

This is the crucial point.

From the beginning of Meiji era, a large number of Western professors and specialists have been imported. The centre being the Imperial University of Tokyo, but throughout the rest of Japan as well.  An even greater number of Japanese have been sent abroad to study, absorb and bring back whatever they have been capable of absorbing.

  This way Japan managed to import the whole of the Western scientific and technological innovations of that period.  Linguistics would be included in the package.

So Tokyo Imperial University opened its course on linguistics under the auspices of the Department of Literature.  For by then as an extension of Natural Science came the birth of analyzing and classifying languages under the heading of linguistics.

This study, imported form the West known as linguistics- is not exactly appealing for most of the Japanese people.

But it is not a study totally unrelated to the Japanese nor is it an utterly benign and innocuous, non-influential  study.

Just as a point of reference, let's briefly examine the procedures of this branch of study.

1) classification   using the Indo/European languages as the model and demonstrating the roots of all these languages as Aryan, they apply this method of branch extension to all languages world wide.

2) grammar    

3) literacy and literature.  

4) phonetics

5) Others- for example semiology

Of course the elite intellectuals, who has spent their lives and fortunes researching these trends would force the same concepts into the Japanese language whether genuinely applicable or not. 

 

DEVELOPPED FROM the

THE UNIQUENESS of the JAPANESE LANGUAGE

Dr. ISHII ISAO'S THEORY on the JAPANESE LANGUAGE

 

Of course the Westernized elite scholar, somehow in order to justify their pay and existence,

must find a way somehow to fit the Japanese language into this linguistic paradigm -whether it really fits or not.  The impact of Western scientific importation does not stop here, but has included such atrocious and irrelevant procedures under the umbrella of 19th century "natural" sciences as acts unnatural as autopsy, dissection and the most irrelevant evil of them all, vivisection.  This direction shows no sign of abating. and the whole world is subjected to this macabre and bizarre technological advances.(retardation?)

 

Vivisection as the word denotes, describes the process in which animals are dissected alive.

vivi-from the Latin alive.

Technically speaking, included under the terminology "animals" are human being.

So one dissects animals(humans).

The basis of biological life is in the cells. Life starting on a cellular level......like an amoeba and progressing on to more complex creatures.  Regarding humans the apex of that development would be the brain. Modern Western biological studies also focused into this realm as well.

 It is said that what makes us humans, humans is the cortex of the brain.

And that brain is divided into left and right hemisphere.   Linguistic capabilities are said to function on the left side.  That is where the seat of Logos (theory, logical thinking) is, and the other right brain is the Pathos (emotion, intuition and sensitivity).

Compared to the Japanese language Western languages seems to be emphatic on the consonants.

In the Japanese language the vowels are emphasized.

Generally speaking Japanese people have a hard time comprehending foreign languages and is not very adept at speaking them.

In the grammar of most, or almost all Western languages there is the definite syntax of an subject, the verb followed by an object. 

Also it is expressed with clarity with the usage of pronouns of whether it is one, two, three or more implied here in the sentence.

Words like, 'I' 'Ich' 'Je' is used to specify who the speaker/subject is and that it expresses the self-me.

Whereas in Japanese this simple word can be expressed in myriads of ways, and over ten way of saying 'I', and often is completely deleted in conversations.

Also in the written expressions, it is positioned in such a manner that this 'I' is non-emphatic, and least stressed as possible.

Japan imported 'Kanji' from China and utilized it as its national language.;

According to Ishii Isao's theory, there are only two cases of absorbing a complete and fully developed foreign language and maintaining its own unique language without it becoming secondary or its own language becoming completely submerged and dissolved in it.

First is the Akkadians who created the akkadian language based on the Sumerian one.

The other is the Japanese language.

They adopted Kanji as their national language and form the Kanji created the Katakana alphabet.

They also gave Kanji two way of reading and interpretation.

First was to pronounce the Chinese style and maintaining its original meaning and the other

was to pronounce totally different with the newer

meaning attached that has been born from the need and for the adaptation to the Japanese language.

By giving this dual interpretation to all the kanjis they ended up creating a language that was almost home-grown and home-spun.

Anthropologically speaking there has been only three cases of a complete development regarding the written language; the Sumerian cuneiform. the Egyptian hierograph, and Chinese kanji.

But both the Sumer and Egyptian civilizations perished few thousand years ago, thus leaving only Kanji as the sole survivor of this development.

 

 

THE PARTICULARITY/PECULIARITY of the JAPANESE BRAIN according to  DR.TSUNODA

 

 For over a century Western educated Japanese elites have been prying and interfering into the Japanese language.

Not just interfering but because of its singularity, -when attempted to be strait-jacketed into the Western linguistic paradigm, it does not fit, hence requires to be mutilated. 

For these intellectuals making the Japanese language confirm and adapt into the paradigm of the West - would be a sign of progress and 'civilization'.   They honestly believe that as Western -baptized leading intellectuals that is their mission.

The words, the vocabulary of that particular ethnic group would be entrenchedly related (obviously) to its music.

Japanese music- as well as its language, when compared to the Western and Eurasion languages and its music, becomes an anomaly.

It has an uniqueness unrelated to the others.

It is not a question of good or bad, or better or not, but the fact that there is unbreachable fundamental difference here.

What has happened is the fact that the Meiji intellectuals as a national curriculum imposed the  Western music as a basis of their education on all elementary school children.

It should be blatantly obvious to any body with a bit of senses and sensitivity to understand that that traditional Japanese music has nothing in common with the Western music!

 "By the imposition of this music training the hearing capability towards traditional music became demolished.  Traditional music has had a long history of development with the Japanese race and its language.  This transgression has been noted by many educational researchers," so states Dr.Tsunoda.

Tsunoda Tadanobu 角田忠信 (1926born, a medical doctor specializing in dental, oral, audio logy, rhino  in ither words a mouth, nose, throat and ear doctor...)

 

An exceedingly rare type of researcher for Japan.

He also stated that "a few years ago I encountered a person, a prominent and influential scholar in the fields of linguistics who told me that linguistics is basically like fashion and the current main stream way is to absorb, digest and re-introduce what is occurring in the West.

Any original research in this field is a loss/waste of time."

Since it is written "a few years" it may be around Showa 47 or so (1972 ).

Not only linguistics, but in all scientific fields since it is all Western based, original research is futile.  Scholars main endeavour is to introduce the latest happenings of the West.  This is probably the real way of thinking, after the initial politeness and noble sounding explanations of attempts, of most of the current Japanese researchers and scholars.

It spound almost oxymoric, a contradictory definition of 'research'.

Dr. Tsunoda is not a linguistic scholar, indeed he is a doctor.

His specialty is in the field of

He also taught at the National University of Tokyo, in the dentistry department

 

 

In reality, there is a direct correlation between 'words/language' and the physical ears.

It is through the ears (auditory channels) that the cerebral hemisphere along with the throat are linked.

Then the linguistic signals are transmitted from the brain to the nerves; enabling the throat, mouth and tongue to coordinate together and produce a coherent sound.

Which is the capability to vocalize and hence speak and sing....-the mark of humanity.

People with auditory difficulties, have their vocal/linguistic development hindered.

If completely deaf, they are usually unable to speak.

And when there is a problem in the left cortex due to accident, or cerebral hemorrhage, verbal capabilities are also hindered or even lost.

Dr. Tsunoda also specialized in aiding these patients with auditory related language problem.

This obviously is based on cerebral research but taken in a larger context, it does involve the field of linguistics and philology as well

Because his research is based on     it really does not involve the basic medical training nor    , let alone linguistics which theoretically would be of a foreign field to him.

It is my guess that people who invade the turf of others(specialization) are really not welcomed.

But if deeply involved in the battlefield to aid patients regain or conquer their verbal capabilities,

then inadvertedly-other fields (including such studies as linguistics) end up being investigated and involved.

To receive an advice form influential person of that field (unfortunately the name is not mentioned) and to be told that "linguistics is a kind of fashion" and to do original research as a waste of time..... -what does all that imply? That all is not well in the field of research if the main motivation for 'researching' is not to research but to parrot the West at a simultaneous velocity.

 

JYOMON CIVILIZATION IS NOT A LOST/'PAST' CIVILIZATION

 

Dr. Tsunoda continued and pioneered a breath-takingly original research that ended up proving the difference between Japanese and many other foreign languages.

 

From his research he concludes that the Japanese people, or to put it more precisely whoever was raised an the milieu of a Japanese language (also Polynesian languages) for the first decade of his/her life would have a pattern in the functioning of the brain different to one who has been raised in another language (i.e. Korean, Chinese, English and most major Western languages).

Finally we have an original research incorporating a point of view that is not the mainstream assumption of post Meiji restoration that has been dominating the research fields of the Japanese accademia.

A truly Japanese take but with solidly documented facts and statistics a la Western natural science research. 

But  this research which should    have launched

   been a minor revolutionary initiative in this field was totally ignored by the collegues.

Instead it was highly appreciated and acclaimed in fileds unrelated to his studies.

"The symposium of 1975 with specialist researchers like Yukawa Hideki 湯川秀樹

Sonohara Taro 園原 太郎Ichikawa Kikuya  市川亀久弥Takeshita Keiji  竹下敬次

Shinagawa Yoshiya   品川嘉也

will become an unforgettable experience of my life.  The encouragement and the expected attention I was given along with the honour I received especially from

Professor Yukawa was what motivated me to actually pen down and conclude my thesis."

Dr. Yukawa, needless to say specializes in physics and won a Nobel prize as a nuclear physicist.  His research is obviously far away from either physiology, neurology or philology.

Both Ichikawa and Shinagawa are well known in the fields of

Takeshita Keiji is a philosophy professor at the Tokyo College of Medicine and Dentistry.

The other person named is unknown to me.

At ant rate this 'symposium' enabled Dr, Tsunoda to receive enough response and encouragement, not form his colleagues-but from researchers unrelated to his field.

Also writers like Abe Kobo安部公房, professor of music at the Tokyo National Conservatory Koizumi Fumio 小泉 文夫, the poet Ooka Makoto 大岡信, and many other prominent figures also showed interest.

It is of interest to note that a book which is essentially a medical/technical thesis would be so well received by the general public.

"The Brain of the Japanese "   within the first seven years of publication (between 1978 to 1985) finds itself with 29 reprints.  It is still popular and by 1993 or Heisei 5, it has been its 34th reprint.   It is exceedingly impressive, given the fact that it is a technical thesis,not written for the laymen!

Dr.Tsunoda deviced a combination of two systems, one called 'keytapping'  and DAF  Delayed Auditory Feedback.  And then created a machine  wherein these two systems were unified

Then he collected data which enabled him to demonstrate a certain difference between Japanese(or Polynesian) raised subject and others.

This is his result.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JAPANESE LANGUAGE IS A LANGAUGE THAT HAS RETAINED ITS 'PRIMITIVE TAIL'

 

According to Dr. Tsunoda, he feels that in Japan there never occurred a division in the mind of the people of separating the brain hemisphere into two and recognizing distinct pattern of differences between the so-called Pathos (emotions, imagination, compassion) and Logos(theorizing, recognizing coherence, and other related epistemological issues), until the encounter with the West.

Observing from the data, generally speaking for the Western people; the left brain is the seat of Logos, of words and consonants, of Logic and calculation.  The right hemisphere will be the Pathos part, functioning for natural sounds, music as well as the sound of machinery and vowels.

 

For the Japanese, the left brain the so called logos/verbal hemisphere will include not just the consonants but the vowels, all human voices as well as the natural sounds of the animals barking or the insects buzzing as well as calculations.  The right brain functioning \towards the sound of musical instruments as well as machinery.

As Dr. Tsunoda continued his research with more candidates he came to the conclusion that the former brain reaction belonged to only Japanese and Polynesians and all the other languages reacted to the Western based pattern including neighbouring Chinese and Korean

language speakers.

Is the Japanese language that different?

 

Watabe Shoichi, professor at Sophia University at Tokyo, has stated that Japanese language is a peculiar, unique language, one that has somehow managed to retain its "primitive tail" He feels that long ago Western languages were also left brain oriented, a kind of brain that incorporated all on just that one side without so much filtering and dividing.

Aside form the Japanese language the others may had their primitive tail cut off time and time again.

According to Watabe, Japan nearly had its 'primitive tail' cut off five times in its history.

  The first time was under Yomei Emperor用明 天皇 when Buddhism nearly completely engulfed Japan.

  The second time  頼朝period.

  The third time was at the time of Houjyou        北 条 泰時 

  Then Meiji Restauration.

  And finally World War II and its consequences.

 

The uniqueness of the Japanese language may be that the primitive tail is still not cut off.

Meaning that the brain pattern has retained the same sequence since the primitive /primordial times.

"When I think of the Japanese culture, I get the feeling that it is not the usual/normal culture as one accustomed to its definition.  There's something funny/peculiar in it (the Japanese culture),"comments- once again Watabe.

 

Here, there is the co-existence of the primordial mentalite' , alongside the latest, Western scientific, technological innovations and techniques.

Most of the other members of earth, has had their 'primitive tail' cut off and no longer possess it..  But Japan somehow managed to retain that.

Hence here is a real possibility that the ancient Jyomon civilization still exists within the mentalite' of the Japanese people.  Something almost encoded in their DNA- but not really as it is the language that maintains and preserves the linkage.

For Japan, or the Japanese language and the two are inseparable as an identity, Western based yard stick is really not applicable.

It does not fit.

It can pretend or be coerced into pretension, but would never spontaneously, genuinely fit.

Statements made by people like Hancock are to be appreciated.

"Jyomon artifacts are the wonderful crystallization of a ancient culture.

When one feels a Jyomon artifact, there is a sensation like being hit by an electrical voltage-

the high level of intelligence, the creativity, or the artistic sensibility of these people are transmitted across time.

It is most fortunate for us that the Jyomon culture is not a lost civilization."

 

 What should be emphatic here is the fact that Hancock states that Jyomon is not a lost civilization. Jyomon is a continuing civilization. 

Jyomon is alive within the Japanese people.

Is Hancock's comment valid?

For a long time the Japanese elite have laughed/sneered at this kind of assumptions.

That has been the history of Japan post Restoration

It is highly possible that the intellectual elites, so immersed and imbibed with the dazzling concepts of Globalism/Free Trade, Bio-technology, the Computer for genetic engineering, the Genome Bank with its high technological aspirations and so forth, may continue to be inebriated with the West, that Jyomon may be out of their sensitivity and vision......

 

I plan to re-read Okamoto Taro (Meiji 44-Heisei 8, 1912-1996) as my next project.

 

 

 

Addendum

More comments on the Japanese language.

Charts form Tsunodas book

Another article on the Japanese language by Ohta.

 






BACK